Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

The Miseducation of Women

Krista Kafer
11.13.2002

James Tooley
September 2002

Recently published in the U.S., a new book by the University of Newcastle's James Tooley is certain to stir up as much controversy here as it has across the sea. Though characterized by British critics as another "putting-women-in-their-place" tract aimed at returning the fair sex to the kitchen and nursery, the book is actually a thoughtful, reasoned look at whether current education policies benefit women in the U.K. and U.S. Tooley questions whether "gender equity" practices and relentless efforts to push women into traditionally male domains like math and science - prompted by Title IX, the Women's Education Equity Act, and their British equivalents - have actually helped women. Calling it "the Bridget Jones Syndrome," he points to the dissatisfaction of thirty-something career women like Miramax's fictional (big-screen) character who find themselves alone and unhappy despite professional success. Women who are pushed to be like men will ultimately be unfulfilled, Tooley suggests, because they have different innate preferences. Tooley builds his case on evolutionary psychology to explain cognitive and behavioral differences between men and women. To undo the damage he believes feminist education has wrought - devaluing domesticity and overvaluing work in the public domain - Tooley recommends doing away with gender education prohibitions and programs. He believes we should end our obsession with numerical equivalency and allow greater variation in how boys and girls are taught. Some readers will have coronaries. Others will find this book a refreshing counterpoint to the feminist-inspired message that nurturing a family is a second-rate choice and a waste of talent. Not every woman is a lonely Bridget Jones, to be sure, but there may be enough such to demand a close examination of gender practices in education. The book deserves attention even if, in the end, you disagree with it. For more information, see http://www.continuumbooks.com/book_details.cgi?bid=2620&ssid=P5JCDJWEKBCUED06A4F07S.

Tags: Title IX United Kingdom
Krista Kafer
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]