Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Mid-course corrections for NCLB

9.1.2004

This month's Phi Delta Kappan has an article penned by American Enterprise Institute education policy studies director Fredrick Hess and Gadfly's own Checker Finn that looks at the implementation of NCLB's choice provisions with an eye toward whether they are being "conscientiously and constructively implemented or appear likely to work as intended." Hess and Finn outline six lessons we've learned over the past two years of implementation of the choice provisions and make several recommendations for mid-course corrections that could increase their chances of success. To wit, they recommend: (1) expanding the "supply of adequate schools into which eligible students can transfer" either by increasing district options, "widening the availability of charter schooling, or putting greater emphasis on nondistrict options"; (2) reversing "the order in which supplemental services and public school choice must be provided" because it makes more sense "to help children improve their performance within a school prior to offering them the chance to leave that school"; and (3) taking steps to "prod districts to notify parents of their options early, often, and in plain, user-friendly terms." Watch this space for more from their upcoming book on this topic, Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, due out on September 14.

"Inflating life rafts of NCLB," Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn, Jr., Phi Delta Kappan, September 2004 (Articles from the September 2004 edition not yet available online.)

Tags: American Enterprise Institute Chester E. Finn, Jr. Frederick M. Hess No Child Left Behind Act
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]