Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

MD's vision on failing schools

4.19.2010

Seldom do stakeholder committees convened by state departments of education put forward truly bold recommendations. Instead, their reports are too often full of requests for more money and status quo-friendly ???reforms.???

And since most work nowadays related to failing schools is dominated by the deeply flawed ???turnaround??? craze, I had doubly modest expectations for Maryland's ???Policy Practitioners' Workgroup??? on chronically underperforming schools.

But to my surprise and delight, the workgroup's report is excellent. Whether its recommendations are adopted or not (and they certainly should be), it may???if we're lucky???signal a new era in state interventions in the nation's worst schools.

Three of the group's ideas deserve particular attention. The first is absolute music to my ears: close schools that are in a persistent state of failure. Though the committee set the bar at nine years of failure (entirely too many in my book), the underlying point is key. If improvement efforts fail, shutter the school and start fresh.

Second, the committee recommends that local superintendents be empowered to petition the state superintendent for waivers from local union contracts when schools reach NCLB-mandated restructuring. Similarly, it recommends that any school in improvement status be able to waive union contract provisions if 70 percent of the school's faculty agrees.

Third, it recommends creation of a ???Teach for Maryland??? program, based on Teach for America, to increase the supply of talented people teaching in needy areas.

In this short report, an inconspicuous workgroup provides a fantastic roadmap for addressing failing schools:

1. Close persistent failures

2. Open new schools

3. Provide school leaders additional authority and flexibility

4. Ramp up human capital efforts

Kudos and congratulations to the committee members for their recommendations, its chair Bernie Sadusky for his leadership, and state superintendent Nancy Grasmick for convening a doughty group to work on this important subject.

--Andy Smarick

Tags: Maryland Teach For America
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]