Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Margins of Error: The Education Testing Industry in the No Child Left Behind Era

Michael J. Petrilli
2.15.2006

Thomas Toch
Education Sector
January 2006

In Education Sector's inaugural publication, Thomas Toch presents a compelling account of NCLB's impact on the testing industry. His bottom line is that the "complex test-making infrastructure is buckling under the weight of NCLB's testing demands." As testing companies expand rapidly, reports Toch, test quality is being left behind. Psychometricians jump ship from state departments of education to more lucrative jobs in the testing companies, and states then lack the brainpower and muscle to keep those companies on the straight and narrow. The result? An increasing rate of blatant scoring mistakes that has caused students to, for example, miss graduation (because of supposedly failing test results), and forced others to attend summer school. But there are subtler problems as well. Because of the prohibitive cost, testing companies resist developing exams that probe beyond basic skills. And unless states are willing to advocate and pay for more complex assessments, the companies are unlikely to provide them. None of this spells a major affront to standards-based reform or NCLB; Education Sector is careful to communicate its strong support for the law. But it would have the feds play a stronger role in improving the country's testing infrastructure, at the least by paying for the training of 1,000 new testing experts and the development of stronger state tests. Its boldest recommendation is for the development of national tests. Beyond the myriad contributions such tests could make to education policy and practice (see here and here), they would also be more cost-efficient than the 50-state patchwork we have now. With a serious discussion of national standards and tests breaking out across the ideological spectrum, is there reason to hope that the time is right? We think so-but we also remember who worked behind the scenes (and put up big money) to torpedo President Clinton's "voluntary national tests" back in the 1990s: the selfsame testing industry. Now it has even more money-and more to lose. You can read the Education Sector report here.

Tags: Bill Clinton No Child Left Behind Act

President, Thomas B. Fordham Institute

Michael J. PetrilliĀ is president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, executive editor of Education Next, editor in chief of the Education Gadfly Weekly, host of the…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]