Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Lessons on class-size reduction from Florida

Jamie Davies O'Leary
11.1.2010

Florida's ?no-win? class-size situation is a foreshadowing for Ohio, as we're bound to come to the same obvious conclusions about universal class-size reduction (CSR) requirements: does it really add value and even so, how the hell do we afford it?

Voters in Florida approved CSR back in 2002 and actually went so far as to embed it via a constitutional amendment (which now requires another ballot measure to undo it) but, as the Miami Herald reports:

With funding tight ? and the state unable to provide the money it had promised ? school districts across Florida struggled to meet the requirements.

And

When state legislators realized last spring that educational goals and economic realities were about to come head-to-head, they agreed to put the issue back on the Nov. 2 ballot. Voters would be given a chance to loosen the class size requirement and compliance based on schoolwide averages.

And Florida's class-size requirements are meek compared to Ohio's. In last year's budget bill, Ohio's lawmakers stipulated that K-3 ratios shrink to 15:1 by 2014 (Florida mandates 18:1 in K-3). Even worse is the fact Ohio's impending $6-8 billion budget hole makes Florida's fiscal woes pale in comparison (at least according to this estimate that their deficit sits at $2.5 billion).

Most people in Ohio already realize that the state's ?evidence-based? model won't be fully funded (short of some kind of miraculous economic recovery), and that the mandates attached to the EBM won't end up having teeth. But in case you're still skeptical, or still being sentimental about small class sizes, here are few reminders of why Ohio needs to jump off this bandwagon fast:

  • - Hiring enough new K-3 teachers to fulfill reduced class-sizes in Ohio by 2014 would require almost 34,000 new teachers and would cost $784 million dollars (annually!);
  • - Even if Ohio miraculously had the money, it turns out that Florida's CSR program has had no discernible impact on student achievement;
  • - The rampant hiring of so many teachers to meet CSR requirements (a 35 percent increase in public school staff over the decade) is really, really unsustainable in case you hadn't heard ? and it doesn't make sense given that Ohio has actually had a drop in student enrollment over that same period.

Hopefully Ohio will get its head out of the sand faster than Florida has.

- Jamie Davies O'Leary

Tags: Ohio
Jamie is the former Senior Ohio Policy Analyst for the Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
 
 
View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]