Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Introducing "Reform Realism"

Michael J. Petrilli
12.18.2008

Now that there's a Secretary-Designate for the Department of Education, we at Fordham are ready with some advice for him. Today we are releasing an "open letter" to the Obama Administration and the incoming Congress about federal policymaking in the years to come. It's our first official statement on No Child Left Behind (and a few other federal efforts) in several years, and it introduces a new "camp" to the debate: Reform Realists . We think that Arne Duncan just might be a "reform realist" himself. (Of course, everyone thinks Arne Duncan is one of their own , so why should we be any different?)

In the letter, we review the current education policy landscape and its main players, and offer our view of the ideal K-12 federal role. We also address the ten big policy battles that are looming on the horizon. In summary, we think that the various education associations, interest groups, experts and think tanks can be broken down into three major groups with distinct agendas:

  • The System Defenders . This camp believes that the public education system is fundamentally sound but needs additional resources in order to be more effective.
  • The Army of the Potomac. This camp holds generally sound instincts about reform, but suffers from a boundless faith in Washington's ability to accomplish significant positive change in K-12 education.
  • The Local Controllers . This camp wants Uncle Sam, for the most part, to butt out of K-12 education-but to keep sending money.

We support a fourth approach, which we call Reform Realism . On the ideological spectrum, it would fit between the NCLB supporters in the center (The Army of the Potomac) and the Local Controllers on the right. But we actually believe that it might serve as a Grand Compromise between all the factions (including the System Defenders on the left).

Read the letter to learn more, and watch for today's Gadfly , where we'll spell out our argument that Reform Realism is a path Arne Duncan should pursue.

Update: The National Review's Pete Wehner weighs in on Reform Realism on The Corner .

White House photograph by Laura Elizabeth Pohl

Tags: Arne Duncan No Child Left Behind Act United States Department of Education White House

President, Thomas B. Fordham Institute

Michael J. PetrilliĀ is president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, executive editor of Education Next, editor in chief of the Education Gadfly Weekly, host of the…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]