Though the phrase "don't know much about history" is now a clich?, we can't argue with the sentiments of this article in National Journal, which argues that the well-intentioned No Child Left Behind act is perversely marginalizing subjects like history. History already had plenty of problem arising for its submergence into the nebulous field of "social studies." This latest development must surely accelerate the historical and civic illiteracy of American school kids. So, is the answer to add these subjects to the NCLB requirements? In the long run, perhaps, but, as Diane Ravitch aptly remarks in this article, "Basic skills are not enough, but if you don't have the basic skills, you can't learn history or science." For now, a focus on the basics may be necessary, but it would be a catastrophe if that meant history and other subjects are forever shunted aside. Note, though, that NCLB requirements are meant to be a floor, not a ceiling. Alien as this may sound to those grumping about compliance, a school or school system or state is free to do more than the law requires. Stay tuned. Fordham will soon several reports addressing this issue, beginning with an examination of where social studies went wrong and some cogent thoughts on what children need to learn about terrorists, despots, and democracy.
"Don't know much about history," by Brian Friel, National Journal, August 2, 2003 (available to online subscribers only)