Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

The Henry Ford model of school choice

Chris Tessone
1.26.2011

Referring to the Model T, Henry Ford famously said, ?A customer can have a car painted any color that he wants so long as it is black.? It turns out that Dr. Jerry Weast, the superintendent in Montgomery County, Maryland, where I live, feels the same way about school choice ? parents can send their kids to any school they want, as long as it's part of the traditional public school system (or you're wealthy enough to send your child to a private school):

So we look at things about school choice, and there's over 150 private schools in our community. And so there's choices for. [sic] And there's choices in our 200 [district] schools with their thematic approaches. So choice is something that's in abundant supply in Montgomery County.

The background is that the Montgomery County Board of Education recently denied two applications to start public charter schools in the county on Dr. Weast's recommendation. The State Board of Education yesterday overturned both those decisions, citing anti-charter bias, an arbitrary review process that broke the county's own rules, and a made-up standard of ?uniqueness? for new public charter schools.

The mess in Montgomery County cuts across a number of pressing issues in education reform. While the county is one of the wealthiest in the country, it has a stubborn and growing achievement gap by some measures. Complacency about good student achievement on average takes attention away from discussion about moving the needle for poor and minority kids, which is a pressing issue. There's also no reason why middle class kids don't also deserve a variety of high quality choices, a topic Peter recently brought up here.

Finally, MCPS's recommendations to kill these two charter school applications illustrate the bad fruits of our tortured system of education governance and finance. Superintendent Weast explicitly raised the specter of budget cuts in his recommendation to deny the schools' applications. He and the county Board have their eyes on what's best for district schools as an institution, and yet the law gives them a veto over innovative non-district schools that would compete with them. It's a thorny conflict of interest, but it's not inevitable. Other, better governance models for public charter schools can be found all over the country ? or just across the border in DC.

?Chris Tessone

Topics:
Charter Schools
Tags: Maryland Montgomery County Montgomery County Public Schools

Chris Tessone was the director of finance and operations of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Bernard Lee Schwartz Policy Fellow, and editor of Fordham's Stretching the School Dollar blog. He is now the chief operating officer for the SeeForever Foundation and the Maya Angelou Schools.

Prior to Fordham, Chris worked in the hospitality industry, including three years as an associate in the Atlanta and…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]