Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

A grand bargain on teacher pay?

6.18.2003

Matthew Miller thinks he's got the answer to teacher shortages in America's toughest schools - and maybe he does, since he's brought to the table both teacher union president Sandra Feldman and Fordham president Chester Finn. In the July 2003 Atlantic Monthly, Miller proposes a deal: the federal government would commit $30 billion per year to raise the salaries of teachers in the nation's toughest schools by 50 percent. In return, these teachers would agree to abandon lockstep pay scales and make it easier to fire incompetent teachers. Miller calls it "Title I for Teachers," and AFT head Feldman - among other union leaders - said she could sign on. To gauge the reaction of reformers, Miller approached the Gadfly's own Finn, who responded with another version that would two-track the compensation system: higher pay for teachers who are willing to give up some job security but not for those unwilling to take that risk. The remaining sticking point: how to measure teacher performance? By increases in student achievement? The judgment of principals and peers? Some sort of blended approach? There are, of course, myriad details to be worked out - and political will to be mustered - before any such plan is rendered plausible. But it's a start.

"A new deal for teachers," by Matthew Miller, Atlantic Monthly, July 2003 (not available online)

Tags: American Federation of Teachers Chester E. Finn, Jr.
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]