Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

The Gadfly Daily's week in review

The Education Gadfly
6.30.2012

In case you were too caught up in all the Supreme Court excitement, here's a quick recap of this week's commentary from Fordham's blogs:

  • “There has been a lot of hand-wringing in the last week about whether charter schools are doing enough to enroll students with disabilities,” Adam Emerson noted on Choice Words. “But are we looking closely at who is among the learning disabled?”

  • On Board’s Eye View, Peter Meyer asked the “existential question of school-board membership: Can you suggest improvement without appearing to criticize the current administration, the current system?”

  • Kathleen Porter-Magee warned on Common Core Watch that “the guidance that’s starting to emerge about how teachers can best select “grade-appropriate” texts is overly complicated and may actually end up undermining the Common Core’s emphasis on improving the quality and rigor of the texts students are reading.”

  • Reviewing the first draft of the Next Generation Science Standards on Flypaper, Checker Finn and Kathleen Porter-Magee argued that “it’s important for America’s and our children’s futures that this come out well. NGSS1.0 got the process started. But NGSS2.0 need to be a lot better.”

  • Aaron Churchell and Danyell Lewis examined Ohio’s approach to achievement-gap accountability on the Ohio Gadfly Daily, concluding, “we hope that Ohio won’t award phantom accountability points to schools without achievement gaps to close, while also appropriately rewarding schools that truly close achievement gaps.”

To stay on top of all of Fordham’s commentary, subscribe to the Gadfly Daily’s combined RSS feed and don’t forget to register to attend a conversation with former secretaries of education Margaret Spellings and Lamar Alexander on July 26, "Ten Years After NCLB: Is the GOP Moving Forward, Backward, or Sideways on Education?"

Tags: Chester E. Finn, Jr. Common Core Lamar Alexander Margaret Spellings Next Generation Science Standards Ohio Republican Party Supreme Court of the United States
+3 More Show Less
The Education Gadfly
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]