Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Fluff piece

6.21.2006

When third-grader Nathaniel Barrios asked at home for a Fluffernutter sandwich (a sandwich of peanut butter and Marshmallow Fluff), his father, Massachusetts State Senator Jarrett T. Barrios, was flabbergasted. The elder Barrios-whom a Boston Globe reporter described as "svelte and fitness-conscious"-was dismayed to learn that his son was learning such non-nutritious eating habits at school, where Fluffernutters are on offer in the cafeteria. The senator quickly vowed to place an amendment in a current anti-junk food bill "that would severely limit the serving of marshmallow spreads in school lunch programs statewide." Here we go again, with administrators pandering to their students' collective sweet tooth and lawmakers trying to over-regulate schools and micromanage their day-to-day operations. And some legislators, such as Senator Richard T. Moore, actually think the anti-Fluff movement doesn't go far enough. He said about the amendment, "we think we can go beyond that for something more comprehensive." Bad idea. Senator Barrios would do well to leave his gastronomical fetishes out of public policy, or quickly get working on another piece of legislation: a state-funded body guard to protect his third-grade son from the nuggies and swirlies that await him.

"Lawmaker wants schools to put a lid on Fluff," by Phillip McKenna, Boston Globe, June 19, 2006 

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]