Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Evaluation of Title I Accountability Systems and School Improvement Efforts: Findings from 2002-03

1.18.2006

U.S. Department of Education; Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development
November 2005

This study is the second in a three-part series that examines the implementation of No Child Left Behind's Title I accountability provisions. It evaluates data from 2002-03 (NCLB's first full year) and finds that local governments and schools, despite overall progress in carrying out the law's accountability requirements, still have work to do. The study points out, for example, that although NCLB requires states and districts to provide support systems (i.e., mentors, curriculum assistance, data analysts, etc.) for schools tagged as needing improvement, almost two-thirds of principals in those schools received no such help. Complying with NCLB's supplemental services and school choice provisions also proved troublesome. Only about half the districts required to offer supplemental services did so, and only 7 percent of eligible students in districts offering services received them. On the brighter side, a majority of districts required to offer school choice (which allows youngsters in "needs improvement" schools to transfer) did so. Unfortunately, they did so in such ways that a paltry 1 percent of eligible students in those districts actually exercised their choice option. This report provides a plethora of information (some of it reported previously), but the authors warn that inferences from 2002-03 should be made with caution because many NCLB policies (notably the precise definitions of adequate yearly progress) were still in development at the time. This series will be more helpful when the third part (looking at school year 2003-04) is released, which will also indicate how NCLB's implementation has changed over time. Meanwhile, the 2002-03 study is available here.

Tags: No Child Left Behind Act United States Department of Education
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]