Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Enhancing Teacher Quality through Knowledge- and Skills-based Pay

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
1.23.2002

Allan Odden, Carolyn Kelley, Herbert Heneman, and Anthony Milanowski, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, November 2001

Allan Odden and several associates at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education recently published this review of the theory and practice of financially rewarding teachers "for acquiring and demonstrating specific knowledge and skills needed to meet educational goals." Note that this isn't what's commonly referred to as "merit pay" as it's not keyed to teachers' effectiveness in boosting their students' achievement. Rather, it's based on attributes of the teachers themselves, what they know and are able to show that they can do. The authors also take pains to distinguish it from "career ladders" which, at least as they characterize them, tend to pull the best teachers out of the classroom into administrative roles. They found seven programs in K-12 education that satisfy their criteria. Based on what they learned from those programs, they identify a set of key design issues; draw eleven lessons (most of them pretty obvious) from "the pioneers"; and briefly discuss policy implications for states. It's fairly general, but perhaps that's all that can be expected from a twelve-page "policy brief." If you'd like to see it, call 215-573-0700 or find a PDF version on the web at http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rb34.pdf.

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]