Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

An Empire State illusion?

1.30.2008

Rumors that New York's state assessments are getting easier in the era of No Child Left Behind have repeatedly surfaced (see here and here). A close look at this National Center on Education Statistics report from last June indicates that proficiency "cut scores" there may have in fact dropped from 2003 to 2005 (at least in fourth-grade and eighth-grade math and reading)--explaining in part the Empire State's big test-score increases over those years. Now comes more evidence from an intrepid New York City parent (and former teacher) that a high-school mathematics test has gotten dramatically easier over the previous decade. According to Steve Koss's analysis, out of the test's 30 multiple-choice questions, a student now only has to get 13 right in order to "pass" the test. That's many fewer right answers than a student in the 1990s would have had to earn. Of course, it's possible that the questions themselves got harder--possible but not likely. At the risk of repeating ourselves: the whole testing enterprise needs a whole lot more transparency and consistency if standards-based reform is to stay afloat.

"NY State Math A Regents Exams - The Soft Bigotry (and Political Payoff) of Lowered Expectations," by Steve Koss, NYC Public School Parents Blog, January 24, 2008

Tags: National Center for Education Statistics New York
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]