Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

ED.gov Readability

6.29.2011

The following is a guest post from David Hoff, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communication Development at the Department of Education.

In ?Are You Smart Enough to Read ED.gov?? Mike Petrilli suggested that the content on ED.gov requires the most advanced reading levels of all websites in the federal government.

As all of us in education policy have learned over the past decade, it's important to disaggregate data. When you slice the readability data across various sections of ed.gov, you see a significantly different story. The overall readability levels for ed.gov are driven higher by a large volume of research and statistics aimed at a specialized audience of researchers and policy analysts. However, the content designed to reach the general public scores significantly better on the Google readability scale than other federal websites.

Here's a quick analysis:

ED.gov includes the Institute for Education Sciences (IES). IES is independent from the Department of Education.? IES is home to several research institutes and the National Center for Education Statistics.? IES operates its own website that is run and managed independently of ED.gov.? The IES site servers are filled with statistical and research reports.

Here are the readability results for IES:

ies.ed.gov

Basic??????????? 1%

Intermediate??????????? 24%

Advanced??????????? 76%

By comparison, the National Institutes of Health has a research-based mission that is similar to IES's. The Google readability result for NIH and IES are almost identical.

www.nih.gov

Basic??????????? < 1%

Intermediate??????????? 21%

Advanced??????????? 79%

When IES is excluded from the Google readability analysis, the results for the ed.gov are significantly different. (This is accomplished by putting www.ed.gov in the search box.)

www.ed.gov

Basic??????????? 7%

Intermediate??????????? 90%

Advanced??????????? 2%

By disaggregating data for specific sections of www.ed.gov, we see that most of the site's most read features are accessible to the general public. These top 10 areas account for almost three-quarters of all page views on ed.gov. In these sections, the readability of sections that are designed for parents, the news media, and the general public is much easier than the site at large.

Here are the readability scores for the www.ed.gov's Top 10 sections:

1. Programs

http://www.ed.gov/programs/ -- 26.72% of all pageviews

Basic -- < 1%

Intermediate -- 74%

Advanced -- 26%

2. About ED

http://www.ed.gov/about/ -- 17.65% of all pageviews

Basic -- < 1%

Intermediate -- 79%

Advanced -- 21%

3. Policy

http://www.ed.gov/policy/ -- 9.82% of all pageviews

Basic -- < 1%

Intermediate -- 88%

Advanced -- 12%

4. Funding

http://www.ed.gov/fund/ -- 7.40% of all pageviews

Basic -- 0%

Intermediate -- 82%

Advanced -- 18%

5. News (press releases, media advisories, speeches)

http://www.ed.gov/news/ -- 5.39% of all pageviews

Basic -- 6%

Intermediate -- 91%

Advanced -- 3%

6. Administrators

http://www.ed.gov/admins/ -- 4.72% of all pageviews

Basic -- 3%

Intermediate -- 68%

Advanced -- 29%

7. No Child Left Behind

http://www.ed.gov/nclb/ -- 3.42% of all pageviews

Basic -- 7%

Intermediate -- 76%

Advanced -- 17%

8. Parents

http://www.ed.gov/parents/ -- 2.17% of all pageviews

Basic -- 48%

Intermediate -- 48%

Advanced -- 4%

9. Blog

http://www.ed.gov/blog/ -- 1.61% of all pageviews

Basic -- 11%

Intermediate -- 88%

Advanced -- < 1%

10. Research and Statistics

http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/ -- 1.44% of all pageviews

Basic -- < 1%

Intermediate -- 23%

Advanced -- 76%

Tags: Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics United States Department of Education
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]