Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Don't blame NCLB

11.2.2005

Congratulations on getting your theory that No Child Left Behind is causing states to lower their accountability standards into the news cycle (see here). It guarantees I'll be talking to people for months who actually believe NCLB has caused lots of states to lower standards for kids and to shy away from their accountability guns.

Would that we really had the standards or standards-bearers for which you're pining in that Golden Era before NCLB.

What's the basis for asserting that a race to the bottom has begun since NCLB? Did you check whether a before-and-after analysis supports the claim?

The discrepancies between National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and state scores are massive and they constitute a big problem, but not one NCLB has caused. Arizona, alone as far as we know among the states you explicitly call out, has lowered its standards and cut scores since NCLB took effect. It would be great if Arizona's leaders took more heat for that bad call. [Editor's note: heat delivered here.] But Texas and Arkansas raised their standards since NCLB was enacted. Even with these examples of states raising standards, it might be fair to say that NCLB poses a disincentive for other states to raise theirs, but that's not the same as states affirmatively lowering standards to look better under NCLB.

Scrutinizing state standards is important, but it's irresponsible to say NCLB is causing states to lower them when it hasn't. Can't we agree there's enough misinformation about NCLB already? Isn't there enough to critique without making stuff up?

The public needs to understand that low state standards do a disservice to kids (who will face much tougher standards in the world of work and college), and that low standards have negative implications for all of us. But telling people it's a problem that's been caused or made worse by NCLB - when this isn't true - is not much of a contribution to that important public conversation.

Please let me know if there's something I'm missing here.


Ross Wiener


Ross Wiener is Policy Director at Education Trust.

Tags: Arizona National Assessment of Educational Progress No Child Left Behind Act Texas
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]