Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Debating teacher certification and spinning support for vouchers in Ed Next

3.20.2002

Should education schools lose their monopoly on teacher certification? Rick Hess, Mary Diez, and James Fraser debate the proposition in the Spring 2002 issue of Education Next (www.educationnext.org). Other articles in the same issue describe how alternative certification programs for teachers are sometimes just as burdensome as traditional ones, summarize the scant evidence in support of teacher certification, and analyze the effectiveness of Teach for America teachers. On another topic in the same issue, Stanford political scientist Terry Moe shows how the annual Phi Delta Kappa survey of attitudes toward education has "cooked the questions" on support for school vouchers in order to generate an anti-voucher result. Moe explains that the organization dropped a neutrally worded question about vouchers in 1991 and added a question that was worded in a way that was more apt to elicit a negative response. As online pundit Mickey Kaus noted on his website (www.kausfiles.com), a smart special interest group would have used a biased poll question from the start, avoiding the need for embarrassing alterations.

"Vouchers: Was a Poll Question 'Cooked'?" by Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, The Washington Post, March 11, 2002

Tags: Phi Delta Kappa Rick Hess Teach For America Terry M. Moe
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]