Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Compromise on special ed

12.10.2003

This week, Education Secretary Rod Paige announced new guidance on one of the stickiest questions surrounding the AYP requirements of NCLB: just how to deal with severely disabled pupils in calculating who is and isn't making adequate yearly progress. The answer is that up to 9 percent of special ed students (or 1 percent of the total student body) may henceforth be assessed for proficiency against the goals of their personal IEPS rather than being forced to meet the general proficiency benchmarks that other pupils must meet. This strikes us as welcome flexibility, an overdue acknowledgment that some students truly cannot clear a high academic bar but can make other important progress. It maintains the spirit and intent of NCLB while giving the lie to the baleful chorus about how unfeeling and unyielding the proponents of standards and accountability are.

"New No Child Left Behind provision gives schools increased flexibility while ensuring all children count, including those with disabilities," U.S. Department of Education, December 9, 2003

"Rules on testing some disabled relaxed," by Andrew Mollison and Dana Tofig, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, December 10, 2003

"Test regulations for special ed students revised," by Beth Braverman, The Express-Times, December 10, 2003

Tags: Rod Paige United States Department of Education
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]