Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Closing Low-performing Schools and Reopening Them as Charter Schools: The Role of the State

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
10.20.2004

Todd Ziebarth, Education Commission of the States
2004

This 12-page paper tackles the proposition, incorporated in NCLB, that one cure for a failing district school is to reconstitute it as a charter school. I've long harbored doubts about the feasibility of "involuntary" charter schools, since a successful charter school is likely to have been created and led by people who want to run a charter school, not people ordered to do so. If, however, a state is game to empty out a failing school and recycle its building as home to a brand-new charter school that's founded and run by people with the requisite zeal (and competence, a sound plan, etc.), and if the state's charter law and funding mechanisms are such that charter schools are really viable there - then by all means. At that point, it resembles "outsourcing" the school to a new operator while taking advantage of freedoms permitted under the charter law. Ziebarth's paper explores these and more issues; state leaders should surely read it and consider this option. You can find it here.

Tags: Education Commission of the States No Child Left Behind Act

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]