Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Choosing Better Schools: A Report on Student Transfers Under the No Child Left Behind Act

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
5.26.2004

Cynthia G. Brown, Citizens??? Commission on Civil RightsMay 2004

The "Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights" is a twenty-year-old private organization supported by the Spencer, Ford, and Hewlett foundations. Nominally bipartisan, it consists primarily of prominent Democrats and is dedicated to "monitor[ing] the civil rights policies of the federal government" and advancing the cause of civil rights. The primary author of this 130-page report is Cynthia (Cindy) Brown, a veteran civil rights advocate who during the Carter Administration held top civil-rights posts in H.E.W. and then the Education Department. This study examines implementation of the Title I public-school choice provision of NCLB in 2002-3 and 2003-4, based primarily on data from a dozen states that responded conscientiously to the Commission's request for information. Its conclusions are surprisingly bullish - surprising both because of the widely reported implementation challenges that this new program element has been encountering and because of what might have been expected to be this Commission's view of school choice. The authors found widespread parent enthusiasm for choice, albeit greater demand than supply; some communities in which sizable numbers of children have been able to opt into better-performing schools thanks to this provision; and some evidence that these choices are leading to greater racial integration. They note, however, that many "advantaged" school districts resist taking in kids from neighboring districts with many schools "in need of improvement" and lament (as do I) the weakness of NCLB's "flabby" provision for inter-district transfers. (In a word, it's optional.) A whole raft of recommendations follows for making these provisions of NCLB work better and just about all of them seem sound. In sum, a thoughtful, encouraging and helpful piece of work. You can find it online by clicking here.

Tags: Democratic Party No Child Left Behind Act

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]