Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Charter Districts

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
7.24.2002

Bryan Hassel, Education Commission of the States
May 2002

The Education Commission of the States has just published a trio of short papers (drafted mostly by Public Impact's Bryan Hassel, one of the country's foremost charter-school experts), dealing with various aspects of the charter-district idea. If you don't know much about charter districts, check out these papers. The longest of them, a ten-page policy brief called "Charter Districts, The State of the Field," explains and illustrates the concept, using a generous definition that encompasses five categories. These range from tiny districts that have converted all their schools into charters, to state-takeover situations (Philadelphia, for example) that include the outsourcing of some schools, to municipalities (like Indianapolis) that have become charter sponsors themselves. I'm not sure the categories add up to a coherent whole and there aren't many real-world examples of any of them. In other words, charter districts are more idea than reality. But in this and the two companion papers, the authors explain their possible benefits and "challenges," offer initial impressions of how they're working (mostly dwelling on autonomy and accountability) and pose questions by which state and district officials can determine whether this reform might suit them. See "Charter Districts, The State of the Field" http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/37/04/3704.htm; "Key Questions for State Leaders in Creating and Supporting All-Charter Districts" http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/35/79/3579.htm; and "Key Questions for District Leaders in Creating and Supporting All-Charter Districts" " http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/35/80/3580.htm.

Tags: Bryan Hassel Education Commission of the States Indianapolis Philadelphia

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]