Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Can College Accreditation Live Up to Its Promise?

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
10.9.2002

George C. Leaf and Roxana Burris, American Council of Trustees and Alumni
October 2002

George C. Leaf and Roxana Burris wrote this 55-page report for the American Council of Trustees and Alumni. It does a good job of setting forth key failings of the current system of institutional accreditation. (One may worry, though, about its historical accuracy. It refers twice to a 1952 "higher education act" that I don't believe existed.) A number of its recommendations are sound. One big one, however, is at best na??ve: the suggestion that Washington stop requiring accreditation as a precondition for eligibility for federal student aid dollars and instead trust the market, assuming that students won't enroll in bad schools. Would that it were so. All sorts of private and peer rating services (such as the famous U.S. News guides) help, but people are still easily duped by false claims made by colleges and their "proprietary" counterparts. At least until Americans have decent comparative information as to the academic value added by individual institutions - which would require a sophisticated testing and/or tracking system that the higher education "community" staunchly opposes - I don't see that the consumer marketplace is an adequate replacement for accreditation, despite the latter system's myriad flaws. Have a look at http://www.goacta.org/Reports/accrediting.pdf.

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]