Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

California Teachers' Perceptions of National Board Certification

Rob Lucas
8.7.2002

The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning
March 2002

The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning has surveyed California teachers certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and issued a new report with a heavily spun subtitle: " Individual Benefits Substantial, System Benefits Yet to Be Realized." A more accurate representation of the findings is found in the report's executive summary, which says, "[Certification] is more valued for its intangible benefits than in helping teachers acquire new skills they can use in their daily work." If there's anything to be learned from this survey, it is in comparing different facets of the National Board program. Teachers give relatively high marks to the process for increasing their confidence and helping them work with colleagues. Half say it improved their teaching ability, but few report that it helped them work with parents and utilize community resources. To read the report, http://www.cftl.org/documents/Beldenreport2002.pdf. For a critique of the NBPTS process, check out "The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Can It Live Up to Its Promise?" by Danielle Wilcox (see http://www.edexcellence.net/detail/news.cfm?news_id=15#48), part of the 1999 Fordham Foundation report, "Better Teachers, Better Schools" (available in its entirety at http://www.edexcellence.net/detail/news.cfm?news_id=15).

Tags: California National Board for Professional Teaching Standards
Rob Lucas
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]