Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

The California Master Plan for Education

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
9.18.2002

Joint Committee to Develop a Master Plan for Education, California state legislature
2002

One can never be sure that an education "master plan" will amount to more than the paper it's printed on, but California is at it again. After several years of labor, a joint committee of the legislature has given birth to this 240-page behemoth, which seeks both to overhaul the state's famed (but now four-decade-old) higher-education master plan and to offer the state a 20-years-into-the-future blueprint for K-16 education. Much heavy lifting lies ahead for any of this to become real, including such controversial provisions as turning the state's elected superintendent of public instruction into a gubernatorial appointee. Two years of (voluntary) public pre-school are sought by the authors, as is mandatory kindergarten, an end to "emergency" credentials for teachers, and so forth-all totaling 56 main recommendations and countless sub-recommendations. A few flashes of boldness can be found in these pages but, for the most part, this is a mainstream, "more of the same," "do it within the existing system" document that's long on regulations and resources and exceptionally thin on unconventional ways of doing things. You'll find little here that smacks of results-based accountability, for example, and virtually nothing that calls for choice, competition or the entry of teachers and principals via unconventional routes. You can download the report from www.sen.ca.gov/masterplan/.

Tags: California

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]