Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

California Charter Schools Serving Low-SES Students: An Analysis of the Academic Performance Index

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
3.27.2002

Simeon Slovacek, Antony Kunnan and Hae-Jin Kim, Program Evaluation and Research Collaborative, Charter College of Education, California State University at Los Angeles
March 11, 2002

In case you didn't know, California State University at Los Angeles has a "charter college of education," two of whose faculty members (Simeon Slovacek and Antony Kunnan), together with doctoral student Hae-Jin Kim, recently issued this brief but bullish appraisal of the performance of 42 California charter schools in boosting the achievement levels of disadvantaged children over a two-year period, compared with non-charter schools serving similar kids. The bottom line: charters are producing greater learning gains for these children, though their average scores remain slightly lower than those of the non-charters. Two additional points bear mentioning: (1) The poorer the students, the greater the charter-school edge in achievement gains; and (2) the smaller the charter school, the wider the edge. The statistical analyses are complex and you may want to see for yourself. You can download a PDF copy at http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/ccoe/c_perc/rpt1.pdf.

Tags: California

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]