Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

The budget ritual

2.11.2004

The federal budget process is something of a kabuki drama, with affected special interests acting out their ritualized poor-mouthing on cue. This is especially the case for Fiscal 2005, in which the White House gave the Department of Education a $1.7 billion increase in a very tight fiscal environment. That includes new money for NCLB, $1.1 billion for Reading First, and an extra $823 million for Pell Grants. Cause for rejoicing in education land? Don't be silly. The budget, you see, eliminates 38 small programs under the department's aegis, penny-ante programs like $5 million for dropout prevention - a ludicrously small amount for a federal program that has shown little in the way of tangible results - or Comprehensive School Reform programs that are generally superseded by NCLB. "Star Schools." Senator Kennedy's pet "Whaling Program." Critics can be counted upon to term this a "budgetary shell game." No doubt Congress will restore some of the cuts (while keeping the increases). And the drama continues.

"Budget shuffle: Schools both gain and lose," by April Austin, Christian Science Monitor, February 9, 2004

"Domestic spending: Gains for education but not much else," by Diana Jean Schemo and Lynette Clemetson, New York Times, February 3, 2004  (registration required)

Tags: No Child Left Behind Act Pell Grant Reading First United States Congress United States Department of Education
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]