Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Bringing School Reform to Scale: Five Award-Winning Urban Districts

12.22.2011

Heather Zavadsky
Harvard Education Press
2009

In these lively and readable case studies, the author spells out--with the appropriate degree of detail--the changes that five urban school districts (Long Beach and Garden Grove, CA, Norfolk and Boston, MA, and Aldine, TX) made on the path to winning the Broad Prize. Several themes weave throughout: These districts implemented a clear, direct, and rigorous curriculum, aligned with high standards and supported at various layers throughout the system. Indeed, revamping the district’s curriculum was the single most important contributor to success. But that’s not all. They were also staffed with highly-capable leaders and teachers. Though superintendent turnover is rife in urban education, the leaders of these districts lasted 6 to 11 years. Data and multiple accountability systems were also critical. The author is clear in linking such reforms to NCLB and to district leaders’ enthusiasm for the law’s provisions. Despite allegations that it’s a “tainted brand,” it’s worth highlighting these examples of this statute working as intended. Buy it here.

Tags: Boston California Harvard Education Press Massachusetts No Child Left Behind Act Texas
+1 More Show Less
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]