Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Bringing Evidence-Driven Progress to Education: A Recommended Strategy for the U.S. Department of Education

12.22.2011

Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy and U.S. Department of Education
November 2002

The Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy is a worthy group of prominent social scientists and other thinkers (including our own Diane Ravitch) that undertook this report in collaboration with the federal Education Department. It argues that future education interventions should be based on high-quality scientific research, which it equates with randomized field trials. This would not even be newsworthy in many fields, but in education it amounts to a revolution. The report urges the Department (which is a bit like the Department urging itself) to devote its discretionary dollars to such research, not only within explicit research programs but also in "discretionary" programs and those where money is set aside for "national" activities. It cites several examples (reading, pre-school, substance abuse) where randomized trials have produced significant findings about particular interventions. (It does not, however, mention the voucher programs that have been subject to similar research.) Perhaps just as important for the education research world, the report is highly critical of the "pre-post" and "comparison group" (or "quasi-experimental") studies that are widespread but often yield biased results. You can download a copy of this provocative document at http://www.excelgov.org/usermedia/images/uploads/PDFs/coalitionFinRpt.pdf.

Tags: Diane Ravitch United States Department of Education
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]