Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Blaine strikes again

8.18.2004

Citing the Sunshine State's controversial Blaine Amendment - which states that "no revenue . . . shall be taken from the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any church, sect, or religious denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution" - Florida's First District Court of Appeal recently struck down the 1999 state law that allows students to use tuition vouchers (Opportunity Scholarships) to escape persistently failing public schools. The court's majority ruled that "there is no dispute that state funds are paid to sectarian schools" and that "if Floridians wish to remove or lessen the restrictions of the no-aid provision, they can do so by constitutional amendment." As the Wall Street Journal reports, far from open and shut, this case is in fact far more complicated. If the Florida Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, then a host of other state funding programs could be in constitutional jeopardy, including funding for medical treatment at religious hospitals, rent to churches used as polling stations, Medicaid, subsidized child care, and state-funded scholarships used at religious universities. Since the U.S. Supreme Court opted not to take the Blaine Amendment head on earlier this year in Locke v. Davey (click here for more), other Blaine states will no doubt be watching closely to see how Florida's Supreme Court deals with this ever-dicey issue.

"Appeal court says Florida voucher law is unconstitutional," by Mary Ellen Klas, Miami Herald, August 16, 2004 (registration required)

 

"Don't Blaine Florida," Wall Street Journal, August 17, 2004  (subscription required)

Tags: Blaine Amendment Medicaid
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]