Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Back to school, back to the debate

9.3.2003

This week marks the beginning not only of a new school year but also a new round of debate over vouchers. In a Washington Post op ed, D.C. school board president Peggy Cooper Cafritz, along with D.C. mayor Anthony Williams and D.C. councilman Kevin Chavous - all former voucher opponents - appealed to Congress with a sense of urgency, arguing that though the pace of education reform in the nation's capital has (they assert) been "steady," it can't happen quickly enough to help students currently trapped in failing D.C. schools. (A vote on whether Congress will fund a D.C. voucher program is expected in the House tomorrow.) While these elected DC leaders were making a pragmatic argument for vouchers, Pacific Research Institute education director Lance Izumi took a more idealistic approach in National Review Online, arguing that voucher proponents should not rely on research to defend their position because, even if the research does not show that vouchers improve student achievement, parents should still be afforded the right to choose the best school for their children. Meanwhile, school choice foes in Florida kicked off a vigorous effort to suspend the state's corporate tax credit voucher program (which gives companies dollar-for-dollar tax credits for money donated to nonprofit groups that award scholarships), alleging, among other things, that these vouchers supported a school led by a man with "terrorist connections" - evidence, they claim, that there is not enough public accountability for the schools receiving vouchers. And in a flattering (but well earned) profile published in the Washington Post on the eve of an expected House of Representatives vote on the proposed D.C. program, the estimable Nina Shokraii Rees, deputy undersecretary of education, was dubbed the "Thomas Paine of school choice."

"Washington's children deserve more choices," by Anthony Williams, Kevin Chavous and Peggy Cooper Cafritz, Washington Post, September 3, 2003

"It's fair," by Lance T. Izumi, National Review Online, September 3, 2003

"Tougher voucher rules proposed," by S.V. Date and Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post, August 29, 2003

"Veto vouchers," editorial, Florida Today, September 1, 2003

"Conflicting American views on school vouchers," by Jay Mathews, Washington Post, August 26, 2003

"From Iran, the 'Thomas Paine' of school choice," by Dana Milbank, Washington Post, September 3, 2003

Tags: Iran Jay Mathews United States Congress United States House of Representatives Washington
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]