Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Are We There Yet? Accountability for the Performance of Students with Disabilities

Kathleen Porter-Magee
2.12.2003

Sara Bolt, Jane Krentz, Matha Thurlow, University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
November 2002

This report by the University of Minnesota's National Center on Educational Outcomes examines state accountability systems to determine the degree to which publicly available documents clearly show whether students with disabilities are included in accountability calculations. The authors found that, for many states, publicly available information does not make clear whether disabled pupils were included or the extent to which their data are used in the state accountability systems. They note that special schools serving students with disabilities are often held to different requirements for accountability purposes. For more information on these findings, which the authors admit will likely change as states adjust to NCLB's accountability rules (as well as the upcoming reauthorization of IDEA), go to http://education.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/Technical33.htm.

Tags: No Child Left Behind Act

Kathleen Porter-Magee is managing partner of Leadership Roundtable. To read more, visit their Substack blog, Renewal.

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]