Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Education Gadfly Weekly
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • EEPS
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
    • Sponsorship
      • Application
      • Sponsored Schools
      • Resources
      • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • About
Home Home

Ohio Menu

  • Policy
    • Priorities
    • Media & Testimony
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
    • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Sponsorship
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
Ohio Gadfly Daily

Fordham Institute media statement on passage of House Bill 154

Ohio Education Gadfly
5.1.2019
HB 154 press release
Getty Images/almir1968

The Ohio House of Representatives, after rushing the legislation through the House Primary and Secondary Education Committee late last night, passed House Bill 154 today. The bill, introduced ostensibly to address issues stemming from the state’s system of school district turnarounds via Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs), weakens the intervention to the point of making it meaningless.

“The state has an obligation to taxpayers and, most importantly, families to step in when students aren’t being served well,” said Chad L. Aldis, Vice President for Ohio Policy and Advocacy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. “While Academic Distress Commissions can and should be improved, HB 154 creates a framework that represents an outright abdication of the state’s duty to intervene on behalf of Ohio’s most vulnerable students.”

The Fordham Institute has conducted a detailed analysis of HB 154 and found merit in a few of its provisions allowing for earlier intervention in schools, focus on school rather than district improvement, and engagement of a broad group of stakeholders in creating a reform plan. However, in its haste to act quickly, the Primary and Secondary Education Committee failed to address some key weaknesses. The bill:

  • Doesn’t provide additional intervention for schools that fail to improve after four years of local control.
  • Fails to establish clear, objective exit criteria for schools operating under an improvement plan.
  • Ignores student achievement and growth as benchmarks for districts to include in their improvement plans.

“Rather than providing important fixes for ADC implementation issues, HB 154 dismantles any sort of accountability,” Aldis added. “If this legislation becomes law, students who attend persistently low-performing schools will be hurt.”

Policy Priority:
Media Statements
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Ohio Education Gadfly

Related Content

view
High Expectations

Why we reviewers are wary about the popular online curriculum resources teachers are downloading

Jennifer Dean, Jenni Aberli, Sarah Baughman, Bryan Drost, Joey Hawkins 12.13.2019
NationalFlypaper
view
Ohio Charter News logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 12.13.19

Chad L. Aldis, Jeff Murray 12.13.2019
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Quality Choices

The glaring errors in NPE’s new anti-charter school report

William D. Flanders, Jim Bender 12.12.2019
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2018 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
Ohio

100 E. Broad Street, Suite 2430
Columbus, OH 43215

614.223.1580

[email protected]

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]