Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events
Ohio Gadfly Daily

Fordham Institute media statement on passage of House Bill 154

Ohio Education Gadfly
5.1.2019
HB 154 press release
Getty Images/almir1968

The Ohio House of Representatives, after rushing the legislation through the House Primary and Secondary Education Committee late last night, passed House Bill 154 today. The bill, introduced ostensibly to address issues stemming from the state’s system of school district turnarounds via Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs), weakens the intervention to the point of making it meaningless.

“The state has an obligation to taxpayers and, most importantly, families to step in when students aren’t being served well,” said Chad L. Aldis, Vice President for Ohio Policy and Advocacy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. “While Academic Distress Commissions can and should be improved, HB 154 creates a framework that represents an outright abdication of the state’s duty to intervene on behalf of Ohio’s most vulnerable students.”

The Fordham Institute has conducted a detailed analysis of HB 154 and found merit in a few of its provisions allowing for earlier intervention in schools, focus on school rather than district improvement, and engagement of a broad group of stakeholders in creating a reform plan. However, in its haste to act quickly, the Primary and Secondary Education Committee failed to address some key weaknesses. The bill:

  • Doesn’t provide additional intervention for schools that fail to improve after four years of local control.

  • Fails to establish clear, objective exit criteria for schools operating under an improvement plan.

  • Ignores student achievement and growth as benchmarks for districts to include in their improvement plans.

“Rather than providing important fixes for ADC implementation issues, HB 154 dismantles any sort of accountability,” Aldis added. “If this legislation becomes law, students who attend persistently low-performing schools will be hurt.”

Policy Priority:
Media Statements
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Tags: Ohio Ohio House of Representatives
Ohio Education Gadfly

Related Content

view
Fork in the road
High Expectations

College or career? On false positives and negatives

Matthew Carr 9.17.2026
NationalFlypaper
view
Sad students on computers
High Expectations

Student AI use is about much more than school rules

Alicia Anderson 9.17.2026
NationalFlypaper
view
Empty desks with backpacks
Quality Choices

The quickest way to expand school choice is to fill empty private school seats

Kathleen Porter-Magee 9.17.2026
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]