Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Gadfly Podcast
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Covid-19
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Policy
    • Priorities
    • Media & Testimony
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
    • Ohio Gadfly Daily
    • Events
Standards & Accountability

Ohio’s Lost Einsteins: The inequitable outcomes of early high achievers

Scott Imberman
Foreword by:
Aaron Churchill
Michael J. Petrilli
9.28.2021
9.28.2021

Too often, high-achieving students get lost in the shuffle in debates about improving education for all. Yet to keep the U.S. and Ohio competitive on a global scale, we need to nurture a next generation of inventors, scientists, and business leaders. Recent debates about race and equity have shown the importance of ensuring that high-achieving children from all backgrounds have ample opportunity to reach the highest rungs of the social ladder.

To shed more light on high-achieving students, Fordham’s latest research report tracks the educational outcomes of Ohio children who scored in the top 20 percent on their third grade math or English language arts exams. Dr. Scott Imberman of Michigan State University conducted deep-dive analyses that follow early high achievers into college.

Key findings include:

  • Gifted identification: Just 34 percent of economically disadvantaged early high achievers and 30 percent of Black early high achievers were formally identified by their schools as gifted. Among other early high achievers, just over half were identified in that way.
  • ACT exams: Less than half of economically disadvantaged and Black early high achievers took the ACT—47 and 41 percent, respectively. This compares with 71 percent of non-disadvantaged high achievers who participated in the predominant college entrance exam used in Ohio. (During the period of this study, the ACT was voluntary for Ohio students.)
  • AP exams: Economically disadvantaged and Black early high achievers took an average of 0.3 and 0.2 AP exams, respectively, versus 0.7 exams for non-disadvantaged high achievers. Average AP exam scores were also lower for those student groups relative to their peers.
  • Four-year college enrollment: Just 35 percent of economically disadvantaged and 26 percent of Black early high achievers went on to enroll in four-year colleges. This compares with 58 percent of non-economically disadvantaged and 57 percent of White high achievers who enrolled in such institutions. 

In addition to documenting these disparities in outcomes among high achievers of different backgrounds, Dr. Imberman also examined the impact of being identified as gifted on early high achievers’ later state test scores. Based on rigorous statistical analyses, he finds that gifted identification modestly improves math achievement for Black early high achievers.

Download the report to dive into the analyses, and consider some ideas that could help ensure that all high-achievers reach their potential.

*****

Gifted identification finding graphic​

Gifted AP exams finding graphic

*****​


Policy Priority:
Standards & Accountability
Topics:
High Achievers
DOWNLOAD PDF

Dr. Scott Imberman is a professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State University. Imberman has written extensively on issues in K–12 education, including publications on school accountability, special education, and gifted and talented programs. He holds a doctorate in economics from the University of Maryland.

View Full Bio

Report Materials

Ohio Gifted report release presentation slides 9-28-21

9.28.2021

Related Resources

view
High Expectations

Assessing the Nation’s Report Card: Challenges and Choices for NAEP

Chester E. Finn, Jr. 5.10.2022
NationalBook
view
High Expectations

Imperfect Attendance: Toward a fairer measure of student absenteeism

Jing Liu, Ph.D. 4.13.2022
NationalReport
view
High Expectations

Follow the Science to School: Evidence-based Practices for Elementary Education

Michael J. Petrilli, Kathleen Carroll, Barbara Davidson 3.21.2022
NationalBook
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]