Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events
Standards & Accountability

Ohio’s Lost Einsteins: The inequitable outcomes of early high achievers

Scott Imberman
Foreword by:
Aaron Churchill
Michael J. Petrilli
9.28.2021
9.28.2021

Too often, high-achieving students get lost in the shuffle in debates about improving education for all. Yet to keep the U.S. and Ohio competitive on a global scale, we need to nurture a next generation of inventors, scientists, and business leaders. Recent debates about race and equity have shown the importance of ensuring that high-achieving children from all backgrounds have ample opportunity to reach the highest rungs of the social ladder.

To shed more light on high-achieving students, Fordham’s latest research report tracks the educational outcomes of Ohio children who scored in the top 20 percent on their third grade math or English language arts exams. Dr. Scott Imberman of Michigan State University conducted deep-dive analyses that follow early high achievers into college.

Key findings include:

  • Gifted identification: Just 34 percent of economically disadvantaged early high achievers and 30 percent of Black early high achievers were formally identified by their schools as gifted. Among other early high achievers, just over half were identified in that way.

  • ACT exams: Less than half of economically disadvantaged and Black early high achievers took the ACT—47 and 41 percent, respectively. This compares with 71 percent of non-disadvantaged high achievers who participated in the predominant college entrance exam used in Ohio. (During the period of this study, the ACT was voluntary for Ohio students.)

  • AP exams: Economically disadvantaged and Black early high achievers took an average of 0.3 and 0.2 AP exams, respectively, versus 0.7 exams for non-disadvantaged high achievers. Average AP exam scores were also lower for those student groups relative to their peers.

  • Four-year college enrollment: Just 35 percent of economically disadvantaged and 26 percent of Black early high achievers went on to enroll in four-year colleges. This compares with 58 percent of non-economically disadvantaged and 57 percent of White high achievers who enrolled in such institutions. 

In addition to documenting these disparities in outcomes among high achievers of different backgrounds, Dr. Imberman also examined the impact of being identified as gifted on early high achievers’ later state test scores. Based on rigorous statistical analyses, he finds that gifted identification modestly improves math achievement for Black early high achievers.

Download the report to dive into the analyses, and consider some ideas that could help ensure that all high-achievers reach their potential.

*****

Gifted identification finding graphic​

Gifted AP exams finding graphic

*****​


Policy Priority:
Standards & Accountability
Topics:
Advanced Education
Tags: ACT Advanced Placement English studies Ohio
DOWNLOAD PDF

Dr. Scott Imberman is a professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State University. Imberman has written extensively on issues in K–12 education, including publications on school accountability, special education, and gifted and talented programs. He holds a doctorate in economics from the University of Maryland.

Report Materials

Ohio Gifted report release presentation slides 9-28-21

9.28.2021

Related Resources

view Students sit at laptops in a classroom while social media reaction icons and notification bubbles appear across the foreground.
Standards & Accountability

High Tech, Low Standards: High School in the Age of Distraction

Brian R. Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. 9.9.2026
NationalReport
view Next Chapter SoR report image - Getty Images/ValerioGalli
Standards & Accountability

The Next Chapter: Ohio’s implementation of the science of reading—and where to next

Aaron Churchill 8.18.2026
OhioReport
view Moving Target Featured Image
Quality Choices

Moving Target: The Success and Failure of Missouri’s Charter School Funding Surge

Andrew M. Camp, Ph.D., Collin Hitt, Ph.D., David Griffith, Ph.D. 8.12.2026
NationalReport
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]