Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events
Ohio Gadfly Daily

Gadfly Bites 7/1/24—Plaudits where plaudits are due

Jeff Murray
7.1.2024
Gadfly Bites logo

News stories featured in Gadfly Bites may require a paid subscription to read in full. Just sayin’.

 

  1. Woot! Another piece of excellent coverage for Fordham’s recent charter school achievement report, courtesy of the Toledo Blade. But this time, the report’s findings of strong achievement boosts for students in brick-and-mortar charter schools versus their traditional district peers is getting noticed on the editorial page, rather than on the news page. Which leads to this extraordinary (if I do say so myself) sentence: “Oddly, though charter school choice has been an undisputed benefit to the residents of urban school districts, Democrats who dominate the urban districts — like Toledo — have not been fans of the concept, preferring to require that underperforming public schools continue to have a monopoly on the urban environment.” Wow! (Toledo Blade, 7/1/24)

  2. Staying in northwest Ohio (and indeed staying on topic, in my own labyrinthine mind), this piece comes to the hard-hitting BG Independent News straight from the Bowling Green State University Office of Marketing and Brand Strategy. (Yes, the source is noted.) In it, the dean of the College of Education and Human Development lauds the tutoring work of her teacher preparation students, who have been providing reading supports for students in “high-need districts” in the area for the last three years, using federal Covid-relief dollars. You can tell that it’s written by marketing folks because this sentence—“Data consistently shows the practice works for everyone, as pre-service teachers tend to be effective tutors who gain additional experience, while K-12 students enrolled in the tutoring programs often make measurable gains in crucial content areas.”—is the only evidence of the program’s effectiveness for the kiddos provided, despite the fact that it doesn’t say that at all. But that lack of data doesn’t stop Dr. Bosslady from having some grandiose visions for the future of the program, including her insistence that “tutoring is teaching, and increasingly, teaching is tutoring” as well as her plan to get legislators to change state law to allow for more more more of it. All this despite the end of pandemic relief spending dead ahead and the lack of evidence that any of the college’s work has benefitted anyone but her so far. (BG Independent News, 6/28/24) Perhaps I was being a tad unfair in the preceding clip. I mean, we’ve got a lot of evidence—in northwest Ohio and beyond—that teaching often isn’t teaching these days. And we also have evidence—like this story, also from Toledo—that tutoring may matter more. But this comes to us from a small nonprofit outfit working to boost literacy for preschool and school-age kids as well as adults who lost out on instruction in the past. This piece is discussing their series of summer camps for kids age 4 to 8 to fight “summer slide” and to help boost kids up to the proper reading level for their age/grade. It’s free. It’s open to any children, no matter what school they go to. It’s held in a beautiful park right next to a city pool. And parents get books and some lessons on how to continue the efforts at home. And while we are provided anecdotal evidence only and for just a single child, I see clearly that “Read for Literacy” is focused on the right things and has the singular goal of helping kids and families in Toledo. So maybe Dr. Falcon is right after all: tutoring is teaching…when it’s done right. (Toledo Blade, 6/28/24)

Did you know you can have every edition of Gadfly Bites sent directly to your Inbox? Subscribe by clicking here.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Tags: COVID-19 Democratic Party Ohio Toledo

Jeff Murray is a lifelong resident of central Ohio. He previously worked at School Choice Ohio and the Greater Columbus Arts Council. He has two degrees from the Ohio State University and lives in the Clintonville neighborhood with his wife.

He is proud every day to support the Fordham mission to help make excellent education options more…

View Full Bio

Related Content

view
Wonkathon

Apply premises liability principles to ed tech

Jordan Posamentier 10.8.2026
NationalFlypaper
view
Wonkathon

Parent dialogue and radical transparency: A school-by-school, responsive approach to digital technology use

Bridget K. Cherry 10.8.2026
NationalFlypaper
view
Rod Paige
High Expectations

A new documentary film chronicling the life and legacy of Rod Paige

Chester E. Finn, Jr. 10.8.2026
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]