Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events

Gadfly Bites - 2/18/15

Jeff Murray
2.18.2015
  1. Most of the discussion of the governor’s education funding proposals so far has focused on districts, the funding formula, and winners/losers. Now it’s time for media and pundits to take a look at what funding changes may be afoot for charter schools. (Columbus Dispatch)
     
  2. Here’s more discussion of proposed charter funding changes…with charts. And something else to note: the PD is the only major daily in the state whose comments section is free and open to all. As I publish these clips, there are well over 300 comments on this story with no sign of slowing. (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
     
  3. If you can stand it, here is one more piece on charter school funding proposals. That story is packaged with another, which features the good folks at Innovation Ohio discussing charter law reforms in both the budget and other legislation currently in hearings in the General Assembly. Interestingly, while they seem supportive of the mainly “sponsor-centric” reforms on offer, they add highlight other changes they’d like to see, which are much more “school-centric”. To wit: “swifter closure of failing charters, transparency standards equal to district schools, and funding that does not punish districts.” Worth a read.  (Gongwer Ohio)
     
  4. Elsewhere in the General Assembly, SB 3, the so-called “education deregulation” bill is not generating a ton of interest. Its first big hearing yesterday garnered only one proponent and a gaggle of interested parties testifying together. Are stakeholders not interested in unfettering the high flyers or are they simply figuring that if it ain’t broke, we shouldn’t be fixing it? NOTE: There are a couple of interesting mentions of education within the juvenile justice system here; an area that is little discussed among education stakeholders in Ohio. (Gongwer Ohio)
     
  5. Away from the Statehouse, officials in Southwest Licking Schools are vowing to improve transportation in the district for next school year, having learned some hard lessons this year. What’s the deal? Some big academic changes (changing from neighborhood to “grade banded” schools and implementing free all-day Kindergarten) created stresses that the business-as-usual transportation system couldn’t handle. The numbers get into the weeds a bit, but it’s an instructive look at how transportation needs/uses/costs can change even when the physical set up of the district doesn’t. (Newark Advocate)
     
  6. Experts in education for students with autism have chosen Cardinal Schools in Geauga County as an exemplar of best practices. Their “model classrooms” were videotaped in action last week for sharing with educators across the state and the country. This is awesome and the story is inspiring. But I would be remiss if I didn’t note that should Cardinal go further and merge with nearby Ledgemont – and indeed if Cardinal joins the proposed four-district consolidated high school in the county – their expertise will be close at hand for many more students in the county. Just sayin’. (Willoughby News Herald)
Tags: Geauga County Ohio

Jeff Murray is a lifelong resident of central Ohio. He previously worked at School Choice Ohio and the Greater Columbus Arts Council. He has two degrees from the Ohio State University and lives in the Clintonville neighborhood with his wife.

He is proud every day to support the Fordham mission to help make excellent education options more…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]