Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events

Gadfly Bites - 11/30/15

Jeff Murray
11.30.2015
  1. The pointed language and slant in this story about busing of K-12 students in Akron (all students that is – district, charter, and private) is impossible to miss, and a number of pertinent facts about how busing actually works in Ohio are absent or elided. I’m going to avoid the obvious bait and simply point out that if families weren’t choosing to go to schools other than Akron City Schools, the “problem” would be far less than is presented here, even without changes to current busing rules. And that the lone parent interviewed gave a pretty cogent reason for choosing another option. (Akron Beacon Journal, 11/30/15)
     
  2. Perhaps the good folks at Akron City Schools should take a break from the echo chamber and read this piece instead. After decades of serious decline, Cleveland Metropolitan School District is cautiously reporting a possible gain in its student population. If it proves to be true, officials in the CLE will have some celebrating to do. What is most instructive at this point, however, is that district officials are crunching the numbers daily and actively trying to figure out where new students are coming from, what district schools they are choosing, and why in order to do more of what already appears to work. And there is not one jot of discussion about transportation in this piece. (Cleveland Plain Dealer, 11/30/15)
     
  3. Also not living in the echo chamber is Patrick Herrel, CEO of Accelerate Great Schools in Cincinnati, with whom a short Q&A was published in the Enquirer over the weekend. He seems to have put together his organization remarkably quickly, if he does say so himself, but of course the real evidence is still to come. I am most intrigued by this statement: “We are thrilled to announce our first two investments in a few short weeks.” Stay tuned to Gadfly Bites!  (Cincinnati Enquirer 11/28/15)
     
  4. The sponsor of a stalled bill that would abolish zero tolerance policies in Ohio schools is cautiously optimistic that the legislation might be revived in the General Assembly after the holiday recess. (Columbus Dispatch, 11/30/15)
Tags: Akron Akron Public Schools Cincinnati Cleveland Municipal School District Ohio

Jeff Murray is a lifelong resident of central Ohio. He previously worked at School Choice Ohio and the Greater Columbus Arts Council. He has two degrees from the Ohio State University and lives in the Clintonville neighborhood with his wife.

He is proud every day to support the Fordham mission to help make excellent education options more…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]