Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events

Quality Counts 2012: The Global Challenge

Daniela Fairchild
1.11.2012

Be you a school-finance junkie, an accountability hawk, or a teaching aficionado, Education Week’s annual Quality Counts report—which scores states on dozens of indicators in six buckets and offers overall grades for each jurisdiction—will be of interest. Celebrating its sweet sixteen, this year’s QC offers updated data in every category but one. The overall rankings? Thanks to Ed Week’s persistent use of some silly indicators like “Chance for Success,” wealthy states continue to float to the top. (More on that here.) Maryland’s B-plus is enough for a four-peat as the nation’s lead scorer; perennial powerhouses Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia follow close behind. Yet some shake-up has occurred, with Florida and Pennsylvania dropping from the top ten. Ohio earns a C-plus across all metrics, buttressed by its A on the “standards, assessment, and accountability” indicator and its B-plus for equity in school finance. Probably most useful are the report’s state profiles, which, after this heavy-reform year, further explain each one’s policies along QC’s six indicators. (Of course, this is the only part of the online report that costs dollars to view.) Worth mentioning too is the host of commentary and analysis of the findings—including pieces by South Korea’s former education minister Byong-man Ahn (famous for pushing back against his nation’s entrenched testing culture) and Sir Michael Barber (the theme of this year’s QC is “global competitiveness”). Also the original survey data on how state policymakers report utilizing information from other nation’s policies and practices, in which twenty-nine states say they use international data when making policy decisions. (We’re rather surprised that twenty-one states admitted to not doing the same.) Steal some time at work and immerse yourself.

Education Week, Quality Counts 2012: The Global Challenge (Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education, January 12, 2012).

Tags: Maryland Massachusetts Ohio Pennsylvania South Korea

Daniela was the development manager and policy analyst for the Fordham Institute. Donning many hats at Fordham prior to this role, Daniela had worked as a research intern, research assistant, and interim new-media manager. She started her career as a teacher of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities, and as a high school rowing coach. Prior to joining forces with TBFI, Daniela was a Global Development…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]