Editor's note: This post has been updated to include a list of all submissions, which we will publish on a rolling basis. Scroll all the way down and click on a title to read that proposal.
For several years now, we at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute have hosted an annual “Wonkathon” on our Flypaper blog to generate substantive (and deeply nerdy, as the name implies) conversation around key issues in education reform. (Last year’s, on ways to promote and support school choice under ESSA, can be found here.)
We’re pleased to announce our topic for Wonkathon 2017: President Trump’s highly anticipated school choice proposal. To be maximally helpful to the folks inside the Administration and on the Hill who are actually working on this, we are seeking blog posts that focus on the nitty-gritty of how such an initiative should be structured. (Meaning we’re not interested here in debating whether choice is a good thing or whether it’s a good idea for the feds even to get involved with it. Though, to be clear, those questions are worth debating!)
Participants are free to propose anything they like, so long as:
- It promotes the expansion of parental choice in education
- It could reasonably be included in a tax reform bill and passed via reconciliation (since, as Politico is reporting, that appears to be the vehicle the Administration and leaders in Congress will try to use)
- It includes the number “$20 billion” (though of course it need not start there and might not grow to there)
(Yes, I know, those are pretty big limitations.)
Are you interested in participating? Please draft a post that describes the contours of your proposal. Is it a federal tax credit and, if so, for whom? Individuals? Corporations? An expansion of 529 plans? A different kind of incentive for education savings? Something else? Would it support private school choice only, or other forms of choice as well, such as charters or magnet schools? Would it rely on state actions (such as the creation of a within-state tax credit scholarship program) or not? To what extent should it address (for example) student eligibility rules, regulations for participating schools, and accountability provisions at the federal level? Or will it leave that up to the states, or to scholarship granting organizations, or something else? For each of these decisions, make a case that yours is the best approach.
We plan to start posting proposals soon—on Monday, February 27. As soon as yours is ready, please send it to Brandon Wright, Fordham’s Editorial Director, at [email protected]. It would be helpful to know who plans to participate, and when you can submit your drafts, so please let us know that as soon as possible. Please aim for between 800 and 1200 words.
Let Brandon know if you have any questions. Otherwise, let the wisest wonk win!
P.S. Please spread the word to others you think might be interested in participating.
This is list of all current submissions, which we will publish on a rolling basis until the Wonkathon is complete. Click on a proposal's title to read it:
- "A 50-state scholarship tax credit" by Thomas W. Carroll
- "A cooperative, constructive, and non-exclusive approach to a federal tax credit program" by John Schilling
- "The Common Core-ification of school choice" by Lindsey Burke
- "Trump Student Success Zones" by Jason Crye
- "Putting kids first: An immediate way to help America's most vulnerable children" by Darla M. Romfo
- "Federal tax credit: Gift horse or Trojan horse?" by Max Eden
- "School choice advocates should be worried about federalizing school choice" by Kristin Blagg and Matthew M. Chingos
- "School choice programs must serve students, not schools" by Travis Pillow
- "Choice trumps: Supporting state success by expanding education options" by McKenzie Snow, Claire Voorhees, Adam Peshek and Patricia Levesque
- "Cut down the constitution for school choice? Beware the devil" by Neal McCluskey
- "Title II scholarships for kids" by Sean Saffron
- "A diversified approach to federal investment in school choice in a bull market" by Nat Malkus