Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Ohio Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Commentary
    • Ohio Gadfly Newsletter
    • Ohio Gadfly Blog
    • Events

2001 State Policies on Assessment Participation and Accommodations

Allison Cole
9.4.2002

National Center on Education Outcomes
July 2002

This thorough if dry report by the National Center on Education Outcomes (NCEO) details the various participation options and accommodations available to students with disabilities when taking state tests. According to both the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and the Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1997, all students, including those with disabilities, should be included in state- and district-wide testing with "reasonable" or "appropriate" (the language depends on the document) accommodations. The NCEO report describes state policies in this area as of 2001 and compares them to state policies reported earlier. Numerous charts show state participation policies, testing options, accommodation policies, groups eligible for accommodations, criteria for making accommodation decisions, and alternate assessments for all fifty states. Noted in the report are the addition of partial participation (when a student takes some but not all of the test) and out-of-level testing (when a student takes the test designed for students at a lower grade level) options, the increased specificity of the 2001 policies, the implications of accommodations for test scoring, and a list of controversial accommodations (such as allowing a proctor or scribe to record a student's responses). Interestingly, "emotional anxiety" was included by six states as a reason for students not to participate in assessments. Accommodations for assessments continue to be based largely on the recommendation of the student's IEP (Individual Education Plan) team, although parents are gaining an increased role in the process. If you'd prefer a brief overview of state policies rather than an exhaustive state-by-state breakdown, the report does a good job of highlighting these in its executive summary and concluding summary. You can find the full report online at http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis46.html.

Tags: Individualized Education Program No Child Left Behind Act
Allison Cole
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]